following is a good article summing-up why commercial "homo milk" on the retail store shelves is mis-labelled. It's more properly called an ersatz industrial fluid … the nutritional value of which is questionable.
Ignoring Mainstream Propaganda
Junk mail. We all get it. Sure, in a lot of cases it’s called “spam” these days. But the snail-mail hardcopy still finds its way to the front door.
Like most people, I just give it a cursory glance and relegate it to the recycle bag. Usually, it’s not much more than an annoyance.
It’s about stuff I wouldn’t have or don’t have any use for at all. So it’s really not much of a problem, just wasteful.
But occasionally, something really gets my goat. (Hey, would that I had a goat. I could feed the mail to him!) Sometimes that junk mail is
downright dangerous. Take for example the junk mail from companies like TruGreen wanting me to poison my lawn and the neighbors by
paying to have their company come dose the ‘hood with toxins. And why does Hillary keep sending me mail? Thank goodness Trump doesn’t have my address yet.
But the worst example of dangerous junk mail arrived in the box the other day. It comes from the folks at Nebraska Medicine. I guess that’s the multibillion-dollar layout in Midtown that includes god-knows how many square miles of institutionalized medical services. Now, make no mistake, in the event of acute trauma or physical crisis, there is no better place to be than an American emergency room. It’s a place where miracles are made every day. But the rest of American medicine? Whew. And that’s what gets touted in this eight-page ad book that came the other day.
Just before casting it aside, this glossy glimmer caught my eye: Got Milk? The Dairy Debate. “Hey, debate?” I thought to myself. “Mainstream medicine getting hip?” Boy, was I mistaken. I read on. The “debate” lasted exactly one paragraph of meaningless hype. It disappeared faster than a Federal subsidy check on the desk of the nearest corporate dairy. As soon as the piece started quoting a Nebraska Medicine practitioner identified as a “medical nutrition therapist,” the story went south.
She started with the statement that “milk is an excellent source of … calcium, vitamin D, potassium and phosphorus.” That bit of ignorance is in and of itself a disqualifier for any further legitimacy.
Prose and Cons. Let’s get one thing straight. Milk is not a source of vitamin D. There is no vitamin D in milk. Milk? Vitamin D? No! Nada! Zip! It is more honest to say, “Plastic bottles are a source of vitamin D” — because you can walk into any store and buy vitamin D capsules. Doesn't mean you should eat plastic bottles.
And further, the calcium in milk is not easy for your body to use. It’s not going to help your bones as much as the calcium from spinach or kale, for example. In other words, its bioavailability is questionable.
The stuff you can buy on the supermarket shelf is a far cry from what is really milk. In a nutshell, it goes like this: Milk comes out of Farmer John’s cows. That could be a herd of 20 in a small milking barn but more likely a herd of five thousand cows who have never seen the sun, penned in a huge metal building. It’s put in tanker trucks and shipped to a giant processing plant. One tanker truck could contain milk from hundreds of different cows from different farms. Once at the plant, it’s filtered to get out pus and some bacteria, heated in the pasteurization process, believed to make it safe but also changing its makeup and destroying enzymes and other nutrients. It’s homogenized by a mechanical process that breaks up the long chain fatty acids into uniform short molecules so that they remain suspended in the final product without cream rising to the top. Forget about the fact that those long chain fatty acids are supposed to remain as long chain fatty acids for proper digestion.
The milk is dismantled into its various components of milk fat, milk serum and liquid. Some of the fat goes into making butter and cream products. The rest is recombined in varying amounts to make skim, low-fat or whole milk. That’s how we get 0%, 1%, 2% and 4% milks at the store. Or did you think there were cows that pumped out a certain type of milk? Then, Vitamins D and A are added to the liquid. It’s recombined into the appropriate marketing formula and packaged as “milk.” It’s about as far from the milk found in nature as Twinkies are from spinach. The corporate storyline is just a bunch of empty prose, kids.
The Vitamin D Myth. So, that added vitamin D is what allows a college-trained nutritionist to call milk a source of vitamin D. Yes, milk in the store will give you Vitamin D — just like a plastic bottle on a shelf will give you a vitamin D supplement. But it gets even worse. The vitamin D added to milk, according to the USDA database, is vitamin D2. That’s not even the kind of vitamin D our bodies need! We need vitamin D3. Look it up.
Break No Bones About It. Let’s end with this tidbit. In a 12-year Harvard study of 78,000 women, those who drank milk three times a day actually broke more bones than women who rarely drank milk. Similarly, a 1994 study of elderly men and women in Sydney, Australia, showed that higher dairy product consumption was associated with increased fracture risk. Those with the highest dairy product consumption had approximately double the risk of hip fracture compared to those with the lowest consumption.
Yes, there is a debate about dairy. But it’s not going to be found in the prejudiced, ignorant propaganda put out in junk mail by mainstream medicine.
Now, if you want to talk about raw milk from a reputable, small, clean dairy farm,that’s a whole other story.
Heartland Healing is a metaphysically based polemic describing alternatives to conventional methods of healing the body, mind and planet. It is provided as information and entertainment, certainly not medical advice. Important to remember and pass on to others: for a weekly dose of Heartland Healing, visitHeartlandHealing.com.
below is an article of utmost importance. Unaware that milk which has been cooked = pasteurized = has lost its Vitamin K2, the author is dismissive of "dairy". Otherwise, the insight she's gained from her experience is MOST important for curing ... yes, curing ... psoriasis. REAL MILK has a major part to play in that.
Vitamins D3 and K2 a game changing psoriasis treatment
Finally wearing shorts after 47 years of psoriasis. Photo by Daniela Ciucci
• In the summer of 2014, my psoriasis flared dramatically. By the
time I saw my dermatologist, 90% of my body was affected by a
combination of plaque and guttate psoriasis. The diagnosis: severe.
Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition that affects three to five out
of every 100 people in North America and Europe. It’s a
four-billion-dollar-a-year business for pharmaceutical companies in the
US alone. It devastates its sufferers and it’s incurable.
Those who suffer with this disease spend thousands of dollars on
creams and medications. They fall for pyramid scheme snake oil promises
of a cure because they are desperate. They risk their health on
pharmaceuticals that can thin their skin, suppress their immune system
or damage their liver or kidneys. There are always side effects.
My dermatologist suggested methotrexate, a chemo drug that can
possibly affect the liver. To be eligible for MSP (Medical Services Plan
of BC) coverage of the newer “biologics,” it would have to be proven
that the methotrexate was either not working or was damaging my body. If
I wanted to bypass the methotrexate – and MSP coverage – and go
directly to biologics, it would cost in the neighbourhood of $20,000 to
$25,000 a year. And there is no guarantee the biologics will work.
Here’s where a handful of luck is better than a boatload of
knowledge. I searched the Internet and found the National Psoriasis
Foundation (NPF) and joined the NPF-sponsored Team Inspire discussion
group. There, I found a thread – patient hosted discussion – about a
little known combination of the vitamins D3 and K2. And there were
impressive photos. With nothing to lose, I ordered the vitamins. I had
already eliminated dairy from my diet.
Six weeks after starting this vitamin protocol, I did not have one spot of psoriasis on my body, for the first time in 47 years.
I started my own thread on the NPF Team Inspire site called “…and his
jaw dropped.” I chose this title because when my dermatologist saw me
after I’d been on this protocol for only five weeks – his jaw dropped.
Within a few months, the thread had grown significantly. Other people
were also getting results.
But then things got strange. Trolls began visiting the thread with
warnings about the dangers of high vitamin D3 consumption. Warning
letters came from Team Inspire. Deletions of posts occurred – some of
them mine and some from those who posted on the thread. More warnings
from the “Team” arrived threatening my suspension from my own discussion
group. I wrote to them asking “Why?” but received no response.
I found another like-minded psoriasis sufferer, Charlie, in Kansas.
He was writing about magnesium chloride used topically. Charlie had
found out about magnesium chloride by accident when he was working on
his pond, tormented by mosquitoes. He noticed his friend wasn’t getting
It turned out his friend was taking magnesium chloride, orally.
Charlie found a bag of road de-icer, which is mostly magnesium chloride
and, interestingly, the highest mineral content in the Dead Sea, a
destination for thousands of people suffering from psoriasis. He mixed
it with water and sprayed it on his arms. It worked and the mosquitoes
A few weeks later, he noticed the psoriasis on his arms was going
away. He sprayed the solution all over his body and although it burned,
he kept it up – several times a day. Four months later, he was psoriasis
free for the first time in over 30 years.
I was also using magnesium chloride along with the K2 and D3 so I
suggested we join forces and start a new thread. Charlie was concerned
he might have trouble running two discussion groups at the same time.
His worries were promptly made irrelevant when Team Inspire shut down
his thread. No explanation was given.
It had taken five months to get to 1,000 posts on my original thread.
Our combined thread hit 1,000 in one month, the fastest growing thread
in NPF history. People who had been using the K2-D3 combination saw
their clearing jump dramatically with the addition of magnesium
chloride. And the reverse was also true. When those who were using only
magnesium chloride added the K2 and D3 supplements, their skin cleared
more rapidly. We knew we were on to something.
But, as we were beginning to suspect, not everyone was happy about our success.
Here’s the reality. Pharmaceutical companies do not fund research of
alternative remedies. There’s no money in it for them. They cannot
patent supplements or vitamins. They fund research for allopathic –
treatment by conventional means – medicines. Period.
Here is the list of the National Psoriasis Foundation corporate members in 2014:
Platinum: Abbvie, Celgene
Silver: Amgen, Janssen
Bronze: Novartis, Pfizer
Corporate: Lilly, Stiefel
Was this foundation being funded by large pharmaceutical companies?
Were they in a conflict of interest? We had to wonder, especially after
Charlie was again suspended, this time permanently. The more that people
sent testimonials about the effectiveness of the protocol, the more we
were being targeted.
We gave up, deciding the only way to get this information out to
people was to start our own website, in which all the information about
this protocol would be free. We used the testimonials that had been sent
to us on the Inspire site – 40 testimonials plus 10 sets of photographs
from people who had gotten results.
Within two days, we were threatened by the NPF Team Inspire with
legal action if we did not remove all the testimonials from our website.
A second letter threatened permanent suspension for me, with the
additional threat that all my posts on the Inspire site – nine months of
work – would be removed.
We removed the testimonials. And Team Inspire removed all evidence
that I had ever written on their site. Nothing remains. And I have been
permanently banned from the National Psoriasis Foundation site.
My crime? I had shared a natural remedy that was non-patentable and
that worked, not just for me, but also for many others. A remedy that
costs very little to maintain. A remedy with virtually no side effects.
There is logic to this new protocol. If three to five people in North
America and Europe suffer from psoriasis and only one to two per 1,000
suffer from it in Asian countries, some questions need to be asked,
including, “Could diet effect psoriasis?”
Excess calcium has been found in psoriasis plaques. Another study
stated that people with psoriasis had an inability to metabolize
calcium. Until recently, most Asian countries consumed little dairy. As
their consumption rises, so does their incidence of psoriasis.
The highest amount of the vitamin K2 (MK-7) can be found in only one food source: natto, a popular food in Japan.
Magnesium chloride is used in the production of tofu, eaten in most Asian countries. And it is used in other Asian foods.
Vitamin D3 is the sunshine vitamin. The use of sunscreen, along with
spending most of the workday indoors, has created a D3 deprived
How does this protocol work? In a simplified version, vitamin D3
pulls excess calcium from soft tissue (skin) and arteries where it
shouldn’t be. Magnesium chloride keeps the calcium fluid. And vitamin K2
(MK-7) directs the calcium to bones and teeth where it should be. Dairy
is too concentrated a form of calcium for most psoriasis sufferers to
It’s encouraging to see more documentaries showing the questionable
workings of large pharmaceutical companies. They have deep pockets and
use them to silence or discount the findings of smaller companies that
promote less invasive, alternative treatments for numerous diseases.
But we need to beware. Recently, a so-called documentary about
psoriasis shows a man whose life has been shattered by the disease,
although you never actually see his psoriasis. His doctor puts him on an
unnamed medication. It’s a feel-good story. His skin is cleared. Happy
ending. However, scroll down through the credits and you see the final
credit – in small print – is Janssen, a large pharmaceutical company and
a Silver Corporate Member of the NPF.
While there is no cure – hence the expression, “the heartbreak of
psoriasis” – there are natural remedies that can reduce it to a minor
irritation. Haven’t heard of them? Now you know why.
After decades of suffering from psoriasis, my skin has remained clear for over a year and a half.
For more information about this protocol – all information is free – visit freedomfrompsoriasis.com
...... the above article by Dakota Hamilton, is from page 8 of Common Ground magazine, for May 2016 ....................
=== Vitamin K2 Essential for Good Bones and Hearts
from the book What I learned as a Medical Journalist by W. Gifford-Jones md
What do the Japanese eat for breakfast that could help North Americans? Every year, 7.5 billion packages of Natto are sold in Japan. The government has made it an integral part of the school breakfast program. Natto contains Vitamin K2, a largely unknown vitamin on this continent and it packs a whammy. Studies show that K2 helps to prevent osteoporosis ( brittle bones) and cardiovascular disease.
In 1929, Danish scientist Dr. Henrik Dam, discovered vitamin K. Later, Japanese researchers reported that women living in Tokyo, where the centuries-old Japanese food Natto is popular, had increased bone density. But women living in Western Japan, where Natto is not popular, showed a decline in bone density. Further research determined that vitamin K2 in Natto was responsible for this benefit.
Today, we know that there are two types of vitamin K - K1 and K2. Leafy green vegetables are rich in K1 and play a vital role in blood clotting. But K2 isn't so easy to obtain in the diet, placing many people at risk for a deficiency.
Bone, like other tissues, is constantly changing. Cells called 'osteoblasts' build up bone and osteoblasts break it down. During our youth, osteoblasts are dominant, creating strong bone that should last a life time. But after age 30, we begin to lose one percent of our bone each year. It's an appalling situation that by age 70 many people have lost 40 percent of their bone mass!
Vitamin K2 has been linked to the osteoblast which produces protein called 'osteocalcin'. The protein plays a major role in calcium metabolism. Osteocalcin is like glue. It incorporates calcium into bone, decreasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures.
Japanese studies show that vitamin K2 decreases the risk of vertebral fractures by 60 percent. and hip and non-vertebral fractures by 80 percent. Other studies show that K2 can increase bone density in postmenopausal women.
But vitamin K2 also fights this nation's number one killer, cardiovascular disease. It places calcium where it belongs, in bones and teeth, and keeps it out of arteries where it causes trouble.
A lack of Vitamin K2 triggers a number of cardiovascular complications. For instance, the lack of K2 increases the risk that calcium will be deposited in the aorta. This is the largest artery and carries blood from the heart to the rest of the body. Calcification of the aorta weakens its walls, increasing the risk of rupture and sudden death. A Rotterdam study of 4,600 mean ged 55 and older in Holland, showed that a high intake of vitamin K2 decreased the risk of aortic calcification by an amazing 52 percent!
Too much calcium in coronary arteries also leads to heart attack. One study showed that adequate levels of K2 decreased the risk of coronary attack by 41 percent. Moreover, excessive amounts of calcium make arteries less rubbery. The rigid blood vessel then sets the stage for hypertension, another big killer.
Today's headlines rarely mention the increasing number of North Americans who are dying of heart failure. Failure isn't as dramatic as coronary attack, but the end result can be the same. We are all living longer and eventually the heart begins to fail. But it will last longer if calcium is kept in bones and not deposited in heart valves, placing more stress on the heart muscle.
There are some precautions about K2. Don't take K2 if you're using blood-thinning medications such as warfarin, have experienced stroke, cardiac arrest or are prone to blood clotting.
Vitamin K1 is present in leafy vegetables, cheese, olive oil, broccoli, cauliflower, green tea and soy beans. Many people are lacking K2 because the major source of Ke comes from steamed and fermented soy beans. No doubt the Japanese like their fermented sticky soy, but it's not what I would enjoy eating every morning.
Preferred Nutrition vitamin K2 contains 100 micrograms of vitamin K2 and is available in most health food stores. The dosage is one capsule daily.
afraid of cowshared milk?
By QUINN MACDONALD
Do you know what a cow is? It seems
like a simple question. But have you
really thought about it? ( If you grew
up on a farm, you’re disqualified. )
That means she’s had at least one calf. Before that, she’s a heifer.
Similarly, you may not have considered the process milk
goes through as it moves from a cow to your fridge. Pasteurization -- heating raw milk to 72 degrees Celsius or
greater for at least 15 seconds – has been around for more than a century. And for the last three decades in British
Columbia, it’s been the law.
milk is still widely available in many countries around the world, including in
some European vending machines, but it
cannot be legally sold or purchased in Canada, the only G8 country to outlaw
its sale, as part of a 1990 amendment to the Food and Drug Act. Two years earlier, B. C. had passed a law
that classified all raw milk as a “health hazard”, and the law persists as Section 2 (a) of the
Health Hazards Regulation under the Public Health Act.
The penalties for selling raw
milk? Up to $3 million in fines and three years in
prison. The only way to legally consume
raw milk in Canada is to produce your own or bring back $20 worth from the U.S.
545 dairy farms and 72,000 cows, B. C.’s dairy industry is the third largest in
the country, behind Ontario and Quebec ; in 2009, the province’s cows produced
over 650 million litres of milk and B. C.’s dairy farms are some of the largest
in the country with an average of 135 milking cows each. The industry employs more than 11,000 people and
contributes over $1 Billion to the economy.
The Milk Industry Act regulates how that milk gets collected and
pasteurized at one of 33 processors in B. C.
Raw milk today represents a conflict
between personal freedom and social safety, as well as a tug-of-war between
industrial farmers, raw milk lobbyists, and their competing health claims. How do we strike a balance between access to
a fresh source of nutrients that hasn’t been pumped out of an abused animal and
pumped full of anti-biotics while acknowledging potential dangers?
The BC Dairy Association (BCDA), a
nonprofit society funded by the province’s dairy producers, includes a “Raw Milk Q&A” on its website
with links to “real life stories” about what can go wrong. It claims pasteurized milk is a healthier
choice “because you can enjoy all the nutritional benefits of milk without the
concern of contracting harmful and possible fatal diseases.”
And yet for all the warnings, people still drink raw milk. They just find
ways around the law.
One avenue to raw milk is a cowshare. It’s a type of herdshare agreement in which
consumers pay a farmer, or “agister”, a
fee to board their cow ( or a share of a cow), care for it, and milk it. You’d be forgiven for not knowing about
cowshares : when it comes to finding raw milk,
you need to know someone who knows someone in the know. And agisters often prefer to remain
anonymous because of their quasi-legal status.
“It’s a very closed society,
secret handshakes and stuff,”
says “Farmer”, a local agister located just outside Victoria
who provides services for the owners of a cowshare.
58, speaks with a slight English accent. He arrived in Canada in 1997 to obtain
a helicopter pilot’s licence and ended up working with Medevacs in
Victoria. Becoming a raw milk agister wasn’t
part of his career plan.
months before the cows arrived, I hd no idea this was going to happen,” he says.
On a hike in 2013, he met a
nutritionist who suggested he drink raw milk, after which Farmer discovered how
difficult it was to obtain. He had
enough property and decided to help others, starting with a woman in Metchosin
looking to get rid of her three cows,
Audrey, LouLou and Victoria.
“I hit the ground running,” says Farmer.
“I made a lot of mistakes. I had
to throw away a lot of milk.”
September 2014, Mark McAfee, a raw-milk farmer and spokesman for the Raw Milk
Institute (RAWMI) in California, gave a
talk at the University of Victoria that is available on line. RAWMI was founded in 2011 because the U.S.
also lacked standards for raw milk. The
Institute’s guidelines act as a resource for regulators, farmers, consumers and
legislators. “You’ll never hear us say
‘guaranteed perfect’ because no food is guaranteed perfect,” McAfee told the
audience. “In fact, the idea that
pasteurized milk is perfect is far from true.”
The U. S. Centres for disease Control and Prevention recorded 77 deaths
associated with pasteurized cheese since 1972; there were zero deaths from raw
milk during that time frame.
says that pasteurized milk is no longer milk but rather a milk product. Most people just don’t have anything to
compare it to. “Unfortunately when you
don’t have a market that’s mature, like
the raw milk market isn’t mature, then people don’t know what they don’t have,
so they won’t go and say, ‘Don’t take that from me.!’
to collect clean raw milk
Victoria the cow meets Farmer
at the gate, but first he needs to feed
the new calf, Solstice. Born on June 21,
the calf will stay on the farm until she’s weaned in four or five months.
Calves take around two years to mature enough to produce milk. That costs
money. Farmer says it’s easier to buy a ready-to-milk cow on UsedVictoria.com
In the milking parlor, Farmer
gets a bucket of oats for Victoria and begins the cleaning process. Cleaning
the udder has three purposes : it keeps the cow --- and the milk – clean, while
the massaging also triggers oxytocin production to “let down” the milk and to
promote the health of the udder. Farmer
uses a soapy towel, folds it in four, and double cleans all four quarters of
the udder, flecking off bits of manure before cleaning around the teat.
goal is to maintain the teats : remove the shit but keep the hundreds of types
of beneficial bacteria that live on them.
Farmer hoses away dirt, dries off the teats with paper towel and does
the “stripping” by removing a few streams of milk by hand to check for
abnormalities and encourage let down.
The cleaning process takes more time than milking.
milk is warm and tastes slightly sour and more full than pasteurized milk. Farmer drinks the frothy liquid from a small
container, something he always does out
of respect for the cows.
The inconspicuous farmhouse
where Farmer lives was built in 1913.
The basement door looks on to the two acres of pasture, so he can keep
an eye and an ear on the “girls” and his helpers while he carries out the next
step in the milking process: filtering. Filtering determines whether or not the
milk will go into people’s jars. Farmer
pours the of the can’s milk through the filter and inspects it. All clear except for a couple of specks. “When I see things like that I think ‘Ehhh, I
didn’t do such a good job,’ but you
know, that’s totally okay, it’s a little grain of something.”
Just because Farmer is
thorough doesn’t guarantee others will be – which supports the case to legalize
raw milk rather than leave its production underground. “I know of other agisters that don’t even
check their filters before they put the milk into the jars.” says Farmer.
Milk is tested for two main
things: coliforms, bacteria found in the digestive tract of animals ( including
humans) and standard plate count, the total number of bacteria in one
millilitre of milk. There is also a routine
yearly test for tuberculosis, a disease that no longer exists in B. C. Both Farmer and McAffee agree that showing
consistently strong, safe test results is how to convince authorities to change
the laws. Farmer tests every month and
displays the results of the last two years on the fridge in the basement.
Farmer says the total coliform
test results tell him how well he’s doing “out there” in the milking parlor,
while the standard plate count number reflects how well he’s doing “in here”,
where he does the filtering, bottling and cooling. Cooling and storage affect test results. To keep bacteria rates low, milk needs to be chilled as quickly as
possible, as bacteria doubles every 20 minutes at room temperature. Farmer uses a converted freezer that he keeps
at 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Since raw milk is illegal in
B. C., the province has no test standards for it. Some commercial dairy farmers also keep high
cleaning standards, but the milk from those who care and those who don’t all
gets mixed together in one of the processors. Conscientious farmers don’t get
compensated for the time spent keeping their operations clean.
A different kind of Herdshare
Farmer’s cows came with roughly 30
clients. That has grown to a total of 70 shares, although some members have multiple
shares and others have only half-shares.
( One share is equal to four litres per week.) As Farmer fills the cowshare members’ jars,
he gestures to seven rows of wire shelves, one per day of the week, lined with
name-tagged glass bottles. Members must provide and clean their own jars for
the operation to remain legitimate. “The
law allows that you can drink milk from your own cow, but I can’t sell it and I
can’t distribute it.” He explains, “so if I was putting milk in my own jars
then that would amount to distribution.”
Farmer will reject any jar that appears contaminated.
Farmer doesn’t like the term
“cowshare” because of its association with people who operate illegally. He calls himself a ‘bovine mechanic” and
compares the process of doing an oil change for a car owner. This mentality sets Farmer apart from other
would-be agisters who own their cows. Because Farmer’s cows came with member
owners, he never developed a sense of control over them.
Farmer has also innovated how to run
a cowshare. “I knew nothing about
it,” he admits, “and it’s just a
beginner’s mind: How should this be done?”
He says his operation is now 95 per cent legal. Under the current contract, which covers both
ownership and his services, he still
has the final say over who can be a member; this power clouds clear
ownership. He and the other members are
working to turn the herdshare into a non-profit, which will then handle shares and hire Farmer
purely for his bovine mechanics. “It’s
not tested in court,” he admits, “but I believe we can have an entirely legal
2003 reply letter to the herdshare from the Ministry of Agriculture about
enjoying a “dividend” from joint cow ownership explained that the Milk Industry
Act “does not prevent you from consuming unpasteurized milk from a cow which
you own.” What if someone owns a cow
but lacks the space or ability to care for the animal and hires someone else to
do so – can the owner still drink its raw milk? In a second letter, sent in 2015, Provincial
Health Officer Dr. Perry Kendall pointed out that “raw milk is considered a
health hazard” and suggested “the double boiler method for home
pasteurization,” but, yes, the owner could drink it.
we know that the authorities agree that it can be done,” says Farmer.
And yet the raw-milk trade remains illegal in B. C. “It is ridiculous how they’ve got these
asked directly, Kendall remains opposed
to legalizing unpasteurized milk and would not promote a regulatory framework
for its sale. Unpasteurized milk, he
says, has health risks, mostly food poisoning,
especially for children and seniors.
Kendall hasn’t seen positive test results from raw milk farmers in B. C.
and says that persuasive evidence would require a big data set. Based on test results from Quebec, which has
a regulatory regime for raw milk cheese, and from U. S. states that regulate
unpasteurized milk, Kendall has still observed
unacceptable levels of bacterial contamination and a higher risk of human
can’t test every product, every litre of milk from every cow, every time you
milk them.” says Kendall. “I know people want to drink it. However,
scientifically, I don’t think there’s
much in the way of evidence to suggest it is beneficial.”
to get raw milk legalized divides the raw-milk community. Farmer disagrees with outspoken advocate
Michael Schmidt, the owner of Glencolton Farm in Ontario, who was convicted of
distributing raw milk in 2011 – and whose farm was raided again by authorities
this fall. As a “loose cannon”, Farmer
says Schmidt has brought attention to the issue but also created publicity
blowback for agisters.
raw-milk “mechanics” have copied Farmer’s less controversial approach. “I don’t have the baggage of people who’ve
been doing it for decades and actually own the cows,” he says.
operations quasi-legal, however, puts raw-milk producers in a paradox where the
regulations don’t need to be changed.
The status quo doesn’t help anyone who wants raw milk but doesn’t want
to belong to a cowshare. And it doesn’t
help dairy farmers or cowshare members recover revenue by selling the extra
can’t be done legally within the existing structure,” says Farmer.
“But it would be better if we can change the regulations and make an
honest living out of it.”
Cleaning up the Conditions
The final step in the milking
process is cleaning up. Back in the
milking parlor, Farmer says his ability to ensure his equipment is clean
distinguishes his farm from larger commercial dairies, which use miles of pipe
and large amounts of equipment – making pasteurization necessary. He mops the rubber mats with diluted
detergent and talks about how people are turning to raw milk herdshares to
reconnect with the source of their food and understand how the animals are
litre of raw milk is a fair amount more expensive than the stuff you buy in the
grocery store,” says Farmer. “But that’s a price they’re willing to pay.”
cows eat only non-GMO feed: grass from his field seven months of the year and
hay for the rest. He plans to reseed his
pasture next year with Indiginous grasses and legumes. As a treat during milking, his cows get a
small amount of grain, using non-GMO
pellets from a supplier in Duncan.
operates h is cows on a milking lifespan of 10 years; anything after that is a bonus. The “girls” are between four and
six-and-a-half years; the matriarch, LouLou, is nearing her peak. On commercial farms, the average lifespan is five years, as older
cows are replaced with heifers and sold for meat. After 10 years, the volume of milk declines and the cows lose
their value as producers, so the cowshare will decide as a group what to do
Testing the Health Benefits
At least 25 per cent of Farmer’s
cowshare clients drink raw milk to benefit medical conditions, including Lyme
Disease, Parkinson’s and gastric problems.
Proponents of raw milk’s health benefits are often influenced by the
“Campaign for REAL MILK,” from the
Weston A. Price Foundation. Founded in
1999, the foundation focuses on “real”
instead of processed foods and lobbies for universal access to raw milk.
Morken, the head of the Victoria
chapter, got involved with the foundation while treating a
chronically-depressed immune system. “I
had a chest cold that lasted six weeks,” says Morken. “That was the turning point.” Her research led to information about gut
flora, which can affect physical and mental health. As chapter leader, she
informs members about local sources for farm-fresh foods.
is quick to point out that she’s just a grandma, not a nutritionist. She gets constant requests from people
seeking raw milk and passes along names to raw-dairy farmers. Because of the law, she never gives out
information on her own accord. “There is
more demand than there is supply,” says Morken.
Morken has written letters to the B.
C. Minister of Health and editorials for local papers. “It’s a simple food-rights issue,” she says.
She also believes raw milk should be legalized so it can be
regulated. “I’d be afraid to drink raw
milk that was not being raised according to standards that people who know how
to keep raw milk safe, have developed,” she says, citing the work of
The evidence, however, for the
health benefits of raw milk remains anecdotal.
In July 2015, John A Lucey, a
professor of food science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and director
of the Wisconsin Centre for Dairy Research, published a review titled “Raw Milk
Consumption: Risks and Benefits.” The
article explains how “recent scientific reviews by various international groups
have concluded that there was no reliable evidence to support any of those
suggested health benefits.”
same review claims that pasteurization causes no changes in the protein quality
or mineral concentration and only minor losses of vitamins. However,
effects of the industrial dairy process not related to pasteurization – such
as packaging material, light
exposure, storage time and
temperature,and type of feed – can impact the nutritional quality of the final
According to Dr Perry Kendall,
reviews commissioned by the Office of
the Provincial Health Officer suggest there is a risk with no real
benefit. He is also troubled by how
online advocates promote the benefits of raw milk for children, who are at a
higher risk for serious outcomes and who, unlike adults, cannot make their own
And what if proponents of raw milk
one day sway politicians to legalize their drink of choice? “If the government did want to create a
regulatory regime, I would like to be
engaged in defining how strict it would have to be,” says Kendall. “It would have to be self-financing, and I
would want a caveat that said you do not give this product to children.”
Morken thinks more research can be done to understand bacteria’s role in human
health. “I get dis-illusioned by the
fact that our modern world thinks we have to prove everything in a reductionist
kind of way,” she says. “when it’s already been proven by thousands
and thousands of years of tradition where people didn’t have the illnesses we
she and McAffee talk about raw milk benefitting allergies and asthma. Lucey’s scientific review did not find any
data to link pasteurized milk to an increase in respiratory allgergies; however, he did cite epidemiological studies
that suggest growing up on or near a farm can decrease the risk of allergies
And here is the crux of the
debate. As McAffee says, “We have city folk wanting to have immune
systems like country folk.” A 2010
paper in Preventative Veterinary Medicine showed that nearly 90 per cent of
Canadian dairy farmers consume milk unpasteurized. Maybe our disconnection from the land bothers
modern urban consumers. We have learned
where our other food comes from … so why not dairy?
can switch to nut milks, but nut plantations have big ecological footprints, while dairy remains a high source of protein
and fats. ( And who really wants to
trade cheese and ice cream for a nut-milk substitute. ) While it might be hard to raise cows in the
city, getting in touch with the source
of our milk products can empower consumers to make better choices about their
food. Until there’s a change in the regulatory framework of raw milk, however, that choice will remain out of reach
for most of us.
Farmer tells a story of two girls
from a nearby school who walked past a neighbour’s field where he had pastured
his herd for the day. The girls stopped
to take selfies with the animals. One of
the girls asked, “Are these cows?”
“Of course they are!” said her friend.
“Well, they’re not black and white.”
Farmer laughed. His own three “girls” are tawny light-brown
jerseys, favoured for raw milk because they have the highest milk fat content
of any cow. The schoolgirls only knew
the stereotypical black-and-white cow, usually a Holstein, like Daisy the
Island Farms’ mascot. That was the
animal you get the milk from. In reality,
a Holstein is just one of 800 breeds around the world.
“It’s so out of touch. It’s crazy,” says Farmer. “And I think it’s true for so many people.”
Winter 2015 . 2016 CONCRETE GARDEN
as of December 12 2015 : I seek pasture land on which to graze a couple of dairy
cows, somewhere from North Saanich to Metchosin ; could be just a small acreage
now lying fallow… or? … I’ll look at
anything. I have skills and tools to do fencing ; repair buildings etc. Contact Gordon S Watson
My email is [ email@example.com ] 250 884 4167 telephone
A recent development in the Campaign for REAL MILK proves my long-standing contention that it is
NOT unlawful for one to drink raw milk from a cow, or goat or sheep, in which he or she
has a property interest. Below is the
letter from the Chief Medical Health Officer confirming that much. In light of this third witness on provincial
stationery, I’m convening an artisanal
dairy which will operate according to the best practices of the Raw Milk
The purpose of
which, is : to supply those who underwrite
it, with fresh whole pure
un-adulterated, un-cooked milk, taken from grass-fed cows… a vital foodstuff
not available from the commercial system.
The REAL MILK produced by such a New Model Dairy is strictly
for the use and enjoyment of those who jointly-own the herd. It is never sold to the public. Since it never engages the commercial system,
raw milk from a cowshare is not caught by the Public Health Act Revised Statutes of British Columbia After the initial subscription price, each member then pays a weekly fee
to the person who actually does the work … known as the ‘Agister’. That would be me
February 18 2015
Dr. Perry Kendall,
Provincial Health Officer
Dear Dr. Kendall,
During the process of buying a cow, I was
chatting with a friend, and she told me that you cannot buy a cow in BC
unless you are the only one milking it,
and that unless you are a commercial dairy, you are not allowed to hire anyone
to milk your cow for you. She said there was a court case that ruled
farmers can’t be hired to care for others’ animals because it would ‘cause a
I plan to keep the cow at my friend’s farm,
because I don’t have room at my place. My friend told me that I was the only
one who would be allowed to milk it and that even if I could quietly hire
someone to milk for me, they couldn’t even put my milk in a jug to take home. Obviously that’s not the case, but because of this conversation, I need you to clarify some things for me:
Is there really a law against me
hiring someone to milk my cow?
Is there really a law against his person
bottling my milk for me?
Is there really a law against me
taking my milk home?
I’m sure you wouldn’t really advise me to drink
milk straight from my cow, but surely there are no laws against it?
I don’t want to lose out on the opportunity of buying this cow and I can’t find
the answers to these questions anywhere, so if
you could get back to me quickly so I have clear direction, I’d really
[ name and signature redacted ]
RESPONSE from Dr Kendall
February 26 2015
Dear, [ name
Thank you for your letter of February 18, 2015
Other than a prohibition against selling or
distributing unpasteurized milk, as per the Public Health Act and other relevant
Acts and regulations, I am not aware of constraints per your questions 1, 2 and
However, I should point out raw milk is
considered a health hazard as it may contain disease causing bacteria. Consumption of raw milk can lead to serious
illnesses such as listeriosis,
salmonellosis, and other serious conditions particularly for the very
young, pregnant woman, the elderly, and people with compromised immune
systems. For this reason, we advise
people to only consume commercially pasteurized milk and to not consume raw
milk. However, if you still wish to consume the milk from your
cow, you can reduce your risk of illness
by following the double boiler method for home pasteurization outlined in the
HealthLinkBC fact sheet “Pasteurized and Raw MILk” located at http://www.
A copy is attached for your reference
P. R. W. Kendall
OBC, MBBS, MHSc, FRCPC
Provincial Health Officer
Ministry of Health Office of the Provincial Health Officer 4th Floor, 1515 Blanshard Street
PO Box 9648 STN PROV GOVT Victoria BC V8W 9P4 Tel: 250 952 -1330
the article above, was written by the local Weston A Price chapter leader.
From here on down, it's all my work
The OUR COWS raw milk dairy ended as of June 5th 2013. Prior to that, my experience in British Columbia, is as follows
From May 2007 to September 2010, we had the Home on the Range private dairy underway. Our herd of Jerseycows provided fresh whole unprocessed milk to us, its owners = eventually, serving about 450+ households from Hope to the west side of Vancouver British Columbia. The cowshare began with Alice Jongerden as the Agister but she was put out of business by Fraser Health Authority in the fall of 2010. We reconvened in a new cowshare, in which Michael Schmidt was the Agister for a while. Agistment services were provided by the 'Our Cows Team'. As of September 27 2011, Health Canada confirmed that the raw milk being produced by the Our Cows cowshare is deemed a "cosmetic". Thus, the stuff came to town in glass jars labelled "Cleopatra's Enzymatic Bath Lotion". . Cowsharing is where several people own shares in a herd of cows and hire a farmer to do the work. Each shareholder makes an agreement with the Agister for services of looking after the cattle and making ready the milk. Shareholders are in agreement individually with the Agister : they are not contracted with each other. Division of the production of the jointly-owned asset is an exercise the right to use and enjoy one's personal property, and also, of the freedom to associate with each other for that particular purpose. Shareholders always have the option and the right to go out to the farm to get their own property ... that would be, the milk.
* Agister is an antique word meaning 'one who takes care of cattle for a fee' ; for instance, the boarding of horses is "agistment". In the cowshare model, a shareholder owns an undivided interest in the herd as a whole, rather than any particular animal. Such a private dairy is not caught by the law against selling raw milk because the milk produced does not enter-in to commerce. Yes, the syndicate of members in a cowshare is a 'producer' according to the Milk Industry Act of BC, but it is not a 'vendor'
There are about a dozen raw milk dairies in British Columbia still operating on a similar basis, ie. "cowsharing", that I know of ... don't be discouraged = REAL MILK can be had if you persist to find those who appreciate it.
Milk from the 'Our Cows' herd was not 'certified organic". Our Jerseycows were on pasture all year 'round with no antibiotics ; no rBGH ; no soy meal nor 'animal byproducts' ie offal, in the feed. They were given a small ration of grain at milking time to train them to come into the milking parlour. Milk from our herd was as good as you're going to get ... which is why it cost so much by the time it got to town = $19.50 per gallon, all taxes in
While researching the law over the last decade, I read the Milk Industry Act of British Columbia, as it stood from 1955 'til 1996. Turns out the original Act had sections by which a farm could be certified to sell raw milk to the Public. In his Royal Commission in to the marketing of milk Commissioner J V Clyne touched on the controversy over the health aspects of raw milk versus Pasteur-ized. He recommended that all milk which was to be offered for sale be pasteurized. But he said that there must always be a way for those who want raw milk to get it. Twice I've asked the Milk Marketing Board for the protocol to apply for such Certification. They just blew me off, saying, essentially, they didn't comprehend what I was talking about.
On February 13 2013, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at New Westminster, I answered the allegation made against me by Fraser Health Authority, of "contempt of Court". The charge was that I did contravene the Order in the Jongerden case by "supplying and distributing raw milk for human consumption". Only a year and a half since Prosecutrix Susan Beach laid the charge figured she'd be running a Stalin-ist show-trial like unto the travesties called Human Wrongs Tribunals, which she's used to. Whereby the Justice system is perverted to harass an Accused for his political activity and/or opinion. But I, and the lawyer for Michael Schmidt, convinced the judge to canvass the thing properly. Mister Justice Wong reserved his decision 'til June 5th 2013. He found us guilty, and sentenced us to 3 months in gaol. That sentence is suspended on contion of good behavior for one year. So I'm in the penalty box 'til June 4th 2014, at midnight. After which I'll be picking up where I left off and proceeding with the Campaign to have REAL MILK de-criminalized in BC.
After ten years' lobbying on this issue, our success - until the little glitch lately - plus the activity of other raw milk dairies throughout BC, makes me confident that the tipping-point of public understanding about raw milk has been passed. the capper being : Health Inspector George Rice admitting under oath in the hearing, that, in his 33 years' experience in the lower Fraser Valley, he had no evidence of anyone ever getting sick from drinking raw milk.
The fact that Fraser Health did not put any evidence before the Court demonstrating that milk from our dairy ever was actually harmful to any given person, proves our point = raw milk dairying can be done safely. The fact that we were never prosecuted by the Crown for selling raw milk, is more than enough proof that a cowsharing arrangement for personal use is exempt from the Milk Industry Act Notwithstanding the communists and idiots in high places perverting Justice as they attempt to outlaw us for feeding ourselves ... for a while, we did have the benefit of wonderful raw milk, to use and enjoy in whatever ways we believed best. So much for the much-vaunted "evidence-based health-care policy", eh?!.
One of the best proofs that artisanal raw milk can be produced safely, is, the experience in England. With a hundred licenced raw milk dairies operating, they haven't had an instance of illness from someone consuming it, there, for over a decade. One farm has 45 years' experience, without any illness arising from the milk. One has to wonder what it is they know, that the so-called "health authorities" in British Canada can't figure out. I urge that new cowshares be started all across Canada in order to meet booming demand for REAL MILK.
for those in the lower Mainland of BC, the closest place to actually PURCHASE REAL MILK - as opposed to participating in a cowshare, is ; the Jackie's Jerseys depot at Cost Cutter 1733 H Street #101 Blaine Washington State
Gordon S Watson < firstname.lastname@example.org >
I saw visions of mists rising from languid streams, their deep banks overhung with mosses and ferns, of thick and spreading English oaks in June with red-and-white spotted Alderney cows lying placidly in their shade, chewing cuds of rich English grass and clover and lazily twitching away flies with their tails Jane Austen
sources of raw milk products in British Columbia
Sacred Circle Farm ~ Unity Within Community 2319 Kemp Lake Road, Sooke B. C.
email address : < email@example.com >
farm's focus is now about providing healing foods to those wishing to
make the transition to a healthier lifestyle. Our
salvation lies in Ancient Futures where the path to healing begins with
a journey to embrace the goodness from a time gone by and assimilate
those ancient wisdoms into our present lives so we transcend into
Sacred Circle Farm's
- Salt Spring: Moonstruck Organic Cheese, 1306 Beddis Road, Salt Spring, BC CANADA V8K 2C9. Web: www.moonstruckcheese.com. Fine farmstead, certified organic cheeses. We milk a small herd of Jersey cows and make all the milk into fine cheeses. Hard cheeses are raw milk, soft and surface ripened are pasteurized
- Vancouver: Les Amis Du Fromage, 1752 W. 2nd Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. V6J 1H6, Ph: (604) 732-4218 or toll-free 1-877-676-1166,
website: www.buycheese.com Large selection of fine European and Canadian cheeses, including many raw milk varieties. *Please note: This is a busy gourmet cheese store, not a health food store While they do mark their raw cheeses, the staff generally does not know what type of cows the milk comes from nor what the cows eat. This store does not sell or have access to raw milk
Enderby: Birdsong Farm, Naomi Fournier, 3695 Trinity Valley Road, Enderby, BC V0E 1V5 Phone/Fax: (250) 838-0235 Email:
Cow, goat and sheep shares available for fresh, cream-line, whole, raw cow's, goat's and sheep's milk, all hand-milked by Birdsong Farm's milkmaids, Naomi and Anna
over the line to the united States
raw milk can be obtained just over the US border and brought back into Canada, quite legally.
When I spoke with the Canada Customs Agency a while ago about regulations, I was told that one may bring $20 worth or twenty kilograms of dairy products per day in to Canada unrestricted, as 'groceries'. No duty to be paid
Jim Sinnema and Family
Old Silvana Creamery
____________ _______________ ___________________
Jackie's Jerseys 5643 Aldrich Road Bellingham, Washington 98226
from Seattle, going North take I-5 exit 262 (Axton Rd., Ferndale) Right at light and head East. Head straight until you reach Aldrich Rd., turn right, and the dairy is the first on your right
telephone 360 398 1889
Jackie's Jerseys raw milk is sold at
315 Cherry St.
Sumas, WA 98295
Contact Bob @ 360-988-4721
Sumas is directly south of Abbotsford. Bromley's market is within sight of the Huntingdon border crossing, in British Columbia.
Community Food Co-op
1220 N. Forest St.
Bellingham, WA 98225
Contact Chuck @ 360-734-8158
Community Food Co-op
315 Westerly Rd.
Bellingham, WA 98226
Contact Emily or James @ 360-734-8158
3328 State Rt. 530
Arlington, WA 98223
Contact Mark Lovejoy @ 360-435-9272
8858 Guide Meridian Rd.
Lynden, WA 98264
Contact Dave or Tim @ 360-318-8869
Following are letters from the government of British Columbia answering my requests for a legal way for us to obtain raw = REAL = milk. Below that are my letters, which led to the ones from the Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Health.
January 15th 2007
Attorney General Wallace Oppal
Minister of Health George Abbot
Minister of Agriculture Pat Bell
Since my previous letters about REAL MILK I have learned even more about how bad the white, industrial fluid passed off as ï¿½homo milkï¿½ is. I could get exercised about your administrationï¿½s failure to perform its duty to protect the Public Health, particularly the outrage of so-called ï¿½milkï¿½ being adulterated with concentrated milk protein from third world countries. God only knows how that astounding perversion of common sense is going to come back to haunt us. But I can only do so much. I am concentrating on making available to people who care about good food, an alternative to the garbage which is out there in the retail sector.
The last few times I went around this, I hoped to get something with which I could head off the ignorant, heavy-handed way the authorities come down on citizens who simply want a glass of REAL MILK. Mr Duffelï¿½s letter of September 15 2005, your file 629995, is close to a Letter of Comfort but it is not enough, against what Michael Schmidt is suffering in Ontario, lately.
Partnering with people who appreciate REAL MILK, I intend to get a few cows and have a farmer look after them for us. When we put our herd in the care of a farmer, who will board the cows including milking them, then ready our milk for us to take home, we will be practicing agistment. Agistment is a word not used in Canada but it is well-understood in the British tradition for at least five centuries. Australians use it in contracts for the boarding of horses, beef cattle and sheep. It means putting oneï¿½s animals in the care of another. The key point is that we are private citizens, co-operating to get the kind of milk we prefer, for ourselves and our families. We will not be engaged in commerce.
Therefore I put forward for your consideration the argument that as we jointly own a cow, or a herd of cattle, and take home milk from that herd for ourselves, we are not doing anything morally wrong, we are simply exercising our right to use and enjoy our property. Section 9 of the Law and Equity Act Revised Statutes of British Columbia guarantees our British tradition of agistment.
There is a different argument to be made that, now with the integrity of the food chain suspect, we have the right, even the duty, to do what we feel is necessary to ensure our own health and personal security.
If the provincial government has any reason why we ought not to engage in agistment in order to be self-sufficient in food, please tell me. I hereby request clarification on the position of your administration concerning my proposition, above.
Even though I abhor the personal income tax as communism in action, I am going to use the internal rationale of the federal and provincial income tax Acts to shed some light on the situation with raw milk. I say that what we intend to do with our cows is similar to the way a race horse syndicate qualifies under the hobby farming section of the federal Act. Since the Income Tax Act RSBC defers to the federal Income Tax Act [ utterly unconstitutional, but weï¿½ll leave that for another day ] then each of those individuals who wants to avail himself of section 31 of the federal Income Tax Act will automatically be seen by Ian Forman, BCï¿½s Commissioner for Income Tax, as a farmer, to a certain extent. Each of them would be asserting his right to farm.
Under the income tax acts, a ï¿½herdï¿½ can be even one animal. For us to share what is produced by our herd of dairy cows is not qualitatively different than members of a syndicate divvying-up prize money won by their stable of race horses, ie. partners sharing in the risks and rewards obtained from a jointly-owned asset.
Please find enclosed the DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY in a recent Court decision in Ohio. I believe that difficulty with the law concerning raw milk, as spelled-out by Judge Hein, is analogous to the situation in British Columbia. Also : a news release concerning whatï¿½s going on in Maryland. The situation in British Columbia is similar to that in Ohio and Maryland. Our Legislature has the power to outlaw the sale / distribution /consumption of raw milk sold / distributed in commerce. But does that include the power to deny it to people who are NOT involved in commerce? No it does not.
A blanket prohibition which pretends to outlaw citizens underwriting the production of food for ourselves is contrary to Canadian values : it is absurd to tell a nation not two generations off the farm that our Biblical heritage of dairying is illegal 'that we can't have the good stuff . that we have to just shut up and go over to the supermarket and be content with the dreck on the shelves there.
Thirty years ago, those who promoted pasteurization could get away with scare-mongering, saying that ï¿½every glass of raw milk was a vector for disease' because the scientific study had not been done to make the case for raw milk. Now it has.
Disabuse yourself of the notion that pasteurization makes milk perfectly safe. Especially, disabuse your-selves of the notion that homogenization is somehow 'a good thingï'. In order to deal with these issues, officials are obliged to inform themselves of the case for REAL MILK as set out in the books The Milk Book by Dr Wm Campbell Douglass, The Untold Story of Milk by Ron Schmid. And WHATï¿½S IN YOUR MILK An expose of Industry and Government cover-up on the DANGERS of the Genetically-Engineered Milk Youï¿½re drinking, recently published by Dr Samuel Epstein.
Notice that Safeway has rejected recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone. Before you tell me that rBGH isnï¿½t allowed to be used in Canadian cattle, get out and get in touch with the facts. ; every day farmers in the lower Mainland drive across the border to buy Posilac, and bring it back to shoot up their cows with. The milk from which is pooled and consumed by British Columbians. The fact that the UBC demonstration farm was caught shipping milk from cows-on-drugs tells us all we need to know. Polluters only stop when they get caught.
Your administration will probably be aware of the decision of the Food and Drug Agency in the United States of America, decreeing that milk and meat from cloned animals is safe. This is just more evidence that the FDA has become utterly perverted from its original purpose ; now it is the actual enemy of the People. That insanity is an outworking of fascism, the FDA being in the pocket of the Big Agricultural / Food processor corporations. Cow-sharing is a perfect example of how, once people completely lose confidence in Big Government, we look after ourselves.
This issue - of consumers demanding REAL MILK - is not going to go away. I know of many people who go down to Washington State and buy raw milk there ~ perfectly legally ~ then bring it back to Canada = perfectly legally. I went around this with Canada Customs : I was told candidly that their position is : raw milk purchased in Washington is the personal property of that Canadian citizen. The limit is 20 kg per day, or $20 Cdn ï¿½ whichever is the less. After that amount, ridiculously prohibitive duty applies.
As a Christian Libertarian, I want as little government interference in my life as possible. But two decades of political activism on various topics have made me realistic on this issue. I and some of the people for whom I speak, would be happy with the set-up for raw milk dairying which is in place in Washington State, where there are about 24 micro-dairies with Grade A licences. I know that dozens of people go down there regularly to get raw milk. It is more likely hundreds. For your research purposes, go to Bromleyï¿½s Market in Sumas or Whole Foods in Bellingham. Then please tell us REAL MILK fans why it is that Whole Foods in Bellingham can handle raw milk safely, but Whole Foods in West Vancouver cannot? You and I know they could, given the opportunity. Thus, there is no other, more logical reason why fresh whole raw milk is illegal in British Columbia but ï¿½restraint of tradeï¿½.
Some time back, on an unrelated topic, I was talking to lawyer George Wool. Prior to being called to the Bar, Mr Wool was a member of the RCMP Commercial Crime squad for 12 years. He told me that one of the projects he worked on was investigating the way law firms would contribute to political parties, then get rewarded with sweetheart contracts. He said ï¿½we had enough evidence to put one third of the law firms in Canada on trialï¿½. An amazing statement, but I believe it because of who it came from.
How that relates to raw milk is, without a doubt, the same quid~pro~quo is at work behind closed doors in the dairy biz as in the lawyering racket. One way or anther, the dairy cartel influences politicians to have raw milk outlawed so as to pad profitability.
Enclosed please find Sally Fallonï¿½s essay explaining how small scale dairying which is oriented to serving local markets, is the salvation of the family farm. Of course, such real free enterprise is what the gigantic corporate ï¿½vulture capitalistsï¿½ cannot withstand. My point being : Regulation 181/88 of the Health Act RSBC was not brought about for any good reason to do with Public Health. It was contrived to maintain the profits of the Big Dairies. It is inimical to the Public Good.
All the laws to do with raw milk donï¿½t have to be amended. I suggest that we ï¿½health fanaticsï¿½ could be accommodated by a formal statement expanding what (then) Minister of Agriculture van Dongen put in his letter [ November 24 2003, your file 0280-30 reference 67746 ] assuring us we wonï¿½t be criminalized for using and enjoying our own property. If not, I shall go to Court for a Declaration of Right
Gordon S. Watson
Hereï¿½s what I received September 19 2005 in reply to requesting the BC Govt. to clarify what gives with the REAL milk. At first, I was disappointed because it seems to be a step back from the previous letter from the Minister of Agriculture. But thinking about it some more, this is a good thing because it pronounces govt. policy is predicated upon the consumerï¿½s ï¿½fully-informed consent about risksï¿½. What a concept !
UNlearned in the law as I am, I believe this letter can be taken to legitimize a cow-op as long as the shareholders pick up their own milk at the farm.
Of course, this is by no means the last word. Iï¿½ll be getting back to Mr. Duffell with a Freedom of Information request for everything the policymakers had in front of them to come to that position. And in that request Iï¿½ll pose a few of the more obvious contradictions between the way raw milk is dealt with versus other products with live bacteria= sushi, raw oysters, steak tartare, raw fruit juices, etc. The best one I came up lately is the fact that at some local beaches during the summer, the coliform count in the water is posted and updated. So people can swim at their own risk in effluent which demonstrably contains human pathogens. But thatï¿½s OK - I guess !
British Columbia 629995
September 15th 2005
Mr. Gordon S. Watson
Dear Mr. Watson
The Honourable George Abbott, Minister of Health, has asked me to respond to your letter of July 8, 2005, directed to the Honourable Wallace Oppal, Attorney General of British Columbia.
You asked for clarification of the governmentï¿½s policy regarding the distribution of raw milk, and specifically whether several people can jointly own a cow or a herd of cows and share the unpasteurized raw milk from that cow or herd.
The Milk Industry Act and the Milk Industry Standards Regulation currently regulate raw milk. This legislation prohibits the sale or supply of any dairy product (including raw milk) unless it has been pasteurized in accordance with the Act and Regulations. This means that raw, unpasteurized milk cannot be sold or supplied to anyone other than a licensed dairy processing plant.
It is Ministry policy to consider that raw milk is not sold or supplied if it is consumed by a person who owns and has direct care and control of the cow -- in other words, a person who knows how the animal and the raw milk is being handled. In these circumstances, the person who consumes the raw milk is considered to have adequate information to assess the risks associated with that particular raw milk. This narrow policy exception does not apply to raw milk that is sold or supplied to someone who is not directly involved in the care and control of the cow and the raw milk.
While I acknowledge that there may be jurisdictions that permit the sale or supply of unpasteurized raw milk to people who do not directly care for or control the cow or cows that produced it, that is not the policy in British Columbia.
I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns, and the time you have taken to bring this matter to the Ministerï¿½s attention.
(signed) SE Beechers??
For Ron Duffell A/ Executive Director Health Protection
Honourable Wallace Oppal
Attorney General of British Columbia
Honourable Pat Bell
Minister of Agriculture and Lands
Ministry of Health Executive Director Health Protection
Population Health and Wellness
1515 Blanshard Street Victoria BC V8W 3C8 telephone (250) 952-1433 Facsimile (250) 952 - 1713
November 24 2003
File : 0280-30 Ref: 67746
Gordon S. Watson
Burnaby BC V5E 1M4
Dear Mr. Watson
The Honourable Geoff Plant, Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Treaty Negotiations, has forwarded a copy of your letter for review. In your letter, you ask for clarification regarding your use and enjoyment on the ï¿½dividendï¿½ from joint ownership of a milking cow.
I can advise you that according to the Milk Industry Act, a person must not sell, offer for sale, or supply any dairy product unless the dairy product has been pasteurized. The Act does not prevent you from consuming unpasteurized milk from a cow which you own.
Thank you for taking the time to advise me of your concerns.
[ signature ]
John van Dongen
pc: Honourable Geoff Plant
Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Treaty Negotiations
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries Office of the Minister Mailing address: PO Box 9043 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria BC V8W 9E2 Web address : http://www.gov.bc.ca/agf/
Phone (250) 387 - 1023 Faxï¿½ (250) 387 - 1522
Honourable John van Dongen, Minister of Agriculture
I understand that the Attorney General forwarded to your attention my letter of August 3 2003, concerning raw milk. It seems to me that Mr. Plant mustï¿½ve made a mistake, directing it to your Ministry, because the thrust of it has more to do with operation of the laws to do with milk vis-a-vis Public Health, than it does agriculture.
Nevertheless ; enclosed please find a recent news article updating and nicely explaining the basis of my proposition. I want you to realize that peopleï¿½s demands for
first, fresh whole organic raw milk
second, gourmet dairy products made from raw whole milk, which we can be sure donï¿½t have Bovine Growth Hormone in them
third, nutraceuticals of animal origin
are not being met by the present production / distribution system. Your government has the duty to actively remedy these problems.
With raw dairy products, weï¿½re into the same situation as what happened with Olera Farms / organic eggs over the last decade : when the established egg producers were all fat and sassy, thinking they ï¿½had it madeï¿½ with their places in the governmentï¿½s protection racket ï¿½ they wouldnï¿½t give Mr. Reid the time of day as he set out to provide consumers the superior product which he knew the market wanted. But when he proved that there was a profit to be made in the high-price end of a genuinely free marketï¿½.well !! The cartel soon found a way to get their mitts on part of whatï¿½d heï¿½d created, didnï¿½t they ? Despite them having refused to do their statutory duty to develop that market! Many of us are disgusted with the way his initiative, instead of being rewarded, was outlawed. The fruits of his hard work were stolen from him in legal fees by those who coveted his success. Point being ; Iï¿½m taking pains to see that the same thing doesnï¿½t happen to me with raw dairy.
Demand is accelerating for REAL MILK ï¿½ and also products made from it. Once people taste the difference, and learn the nutritional superiority / health benefits of fresh whole raw version, they will not settle for the thin, denatured, lowest-common-denominator stuff which we were deceived for a generation to call ï¿½milk ï¿½. Did you notice in my material that homogenization of milk has been PROVED to cause arteriosclerosis ? Wait ï¿½til the lawyers get ï¿½hold of that one.
As sketched out in my letter to the Attorney General, I am sure that British Columbians still maintain the right to use and enjoy our own property in the form of cattle on the hoof. And I say that a consequence of that right is that we can associate in a common law partnership for doing jointly whatever we may do as individuals.
Just as thereï¿½s nothing stopping me from drinking raw milk taken from a cow which I wholly own, neither should there be any let or hindrance upon me, or others who hold an interest in her, from enjoying the same perfectly natural milk from a cow , or a goat, which we each own part of. Think of it as ï¿½the right to farmï¿½ practiced on a household scale.
Your government says that youï¿½re getting rid of red tape ï¿½ good for you ! Letï¿½s see Minister Falconer address Regulation 181/88 of the Health Act Revised Statutes of British Columbia. Letï¿½s see that election promise put on government stationery. Legitimizing a way for people to obtain raw dairy products could be done very simply, by way of an amendment to the Milk Industry Act
RS BC which would categorically exempt from prosecution individuals who have an interest in the animal, or herd, which produced that very milk.
I request that your government make it perfectly clear to all concerned, by way of a Letter of Comfort to me, that individuals who own shares in a cow, in common, will not be prosecuted for simply exercising our right to enjoy the dividend from what that chattel produces, particularly, her milk. And for precision, such a Declaration ought to address the situation where individuals who own an interest, or several shares, in a herd of cattle are entitled to use and enjoy what that asset as a whole, produces.
Gordon S. Watson
August 3 2003
Attorney General of British Columbia Geoff Plant
Enclosed please find items pertaining to whole fresh raw cowï¿½s / goatï¿½s milk, for which I use the term ï¿½REAL MILKï¿½ so as to differentiate it from whatï¿½s commercially available. Since the beginning of history, people have produced and consumed REAL MILK and thrived on it, yet in this province today it is categorically outlawed.
Please look at my letter to the Minister of Health where I explained the insanity of those who want REAL MILK being denied it by law, while other substances which are known poisons are freely available from government outlets. The Minister at that time did nothing. Therefore I am now proposing a couple of ways people who want REAL MILK can have it without being prosecuted.
The simplest solution for the official stupidity described in my letter to the Minister of Health, and below, is for your government to immediately repeal Regulation 181/88 of the Health Act RSBC. But I am not optimistic that common sense remedy will happen because the entrenched commercial interests would balk.
Therefore I propose a ï¿½walk-aroundï¿½ of the law, (as the slang term is in your office) so we can get what we want without all the expense / inefficiency of a full-tilt constitutional challenge to the legislation.
As part of my efforts to get REAL MILK flowing here, I had a conversation with a farmer in California who produces and sells it - quite legally ! - down there. At the moment, he doesnï¿½t have any extra to ship us. But what do you think would happen if he got a bee in his bonnet about being prevented by B. C. and Canadian laws from doing business with me ?
To start with, we have the WTO ruling on our side. I expect you, and your legal advisers, are already thinking long and hard about the legality of the dairy monopoly in light of recent rulings of the World Trade Organization. I urge all concerned to read the Competition Act Revised Statues of Canada vis-ï¿½-vis British Columbiansï¿½ demand for REAL MILK. I draw your attention to section 21 of the Natural Products Marketing Act RSBC wherein the bright lights who drafted it acknowledge they knew it was unconstitutional ab initio ! I donï¿½t need a law degree to figure out that the rules against raw milk are on very thin ice.
The last thing I want is an ordeal of a court case. So my position on the legality of REAL MILK is ; ï¿½letï¿½s be reasonableï¿½. I want to stay out of court if possible. Is it worth all the hassle of sending in your high-priced legal beagles to defend the communistic centrally-dictated supply system when itï¿½s understood all ï¿½round that the entire ï¿½Marketing Boardï¿½ house-of-cards is crumbling, anyway ?
But back to ï¿½healthï¿½. There is more than enough scientific evidence now to prove that the product merchandised as ï¿½homo milkï¿½ on retail store shelves is inferior to REAL MILK since much of the food value is stripped away in processing. Worse, the case can be made that once homogenized and pasteurized, so-called ï¿½milkï¿½ is dangerous to public health.
Medical science has known for half a century that widespread homogenization of the milk supply is the major factor causing hardening of the arteries. The public continues to be duped so the dairy monopoly doesnï¿½t have to spend what it would take to reform its production / distribution system. It is nothing less than a crime that while the homogenization of milk is known to be a menace to health, that fact has been suppressed from public understanding.
How ironic that the good stuff, REAL MILK, is illegal, meanwhile the bad stuff, proven to harm human health, is sold openly. I remind you of what happened in the ï¿½tainted blood scandalï¿½, where certain businesses continued even after they knew that what they were doing was deadly. As you read this, officials in British Columbia are responsible for having knowledge now about the harm homogenized milk does, yet are failing to do their duty to protect the public.
It is a well known fact that cooking milk in a certain way - called ï¿½pasteurizationï¿½ - destroys vital enzymes and renders portions of the proteins and minerals unavailable within the human metabolism. Knowledge that pasteurizing milk degrades its nutritional value has been suppressed for the same reasons the studies about homogenization are hidden : profitability of the dairy cartel and to hide culpability for undermining public health. Not to mention, the enormous profits in the aftermarket for the very ï¿½supplementsï¿½ which are removed out of the original raw milk. The ruining of the taste is no small issue, either.
What becomes clear is that this situation - governments sacrificing public health in order that big business shall prosper - persists only because bureaucrats are bamboozled by deceptive propaganda. Raw milk has been outlawed as part of ï¿½moving the yardsticksï¿½ in the marketplace ï¿½ so consumers whoï¿½ve forgotten what REAL MILK is will unthinkingly accept the inferior product presented on supermarket shelves. Just a co-incidence that the ones who benefit from driving out competition - Dairy World = Ault Dairies = the Bronfmann empire et al. - are major contributors to political parties ?
Twenty miles from where I live, raw cowï¿½s / goatï¿½s milk are freely available at a good price, from dairies which differ from small holders in B. C. only in that they have a permit from the state of Washington. What is it they know down there - and the 30 other states in the US where raw milk is sold legally - that the governors of British Columbia canï¿½t figure out ? What is it the people in the European Economic Community ( a market of a mere 300 million consumers ) know about handling dairy products that British Columbiaï¿½s dairymen canï¿½t grasp?
As for the dairy cartelï¿½s usual first-line of argument - health issues - I urge you to delegate someone to study the material being published by the promoters of REAL MILK so as to be prepared to explain to me, and the thousands of people like me who simply want to obtain good food, why one of natureï¿½s most perfect foods - whole fresh raw milk - is illegal ?
I can tell you right now there is no good nor sufficient reason. The pretence that raw milk is a ï¿½health hazardï¿½ is a canard. Having investigated this situation in depth I conclude that there is no other, more logical explanation for it but restraint of trade.
In 1984 I started distributing various products to health food stores. Over the next two decades I watched organic food go from being a fringe category, ï¿½til now, where itï¿½s about 15% of the fresh food market by dollar value. Last year, the lady with whom I started in business back then brokered nearly two million dollars of organics to the largest food store chain in B. C. Twenty years ago, agricultural officials sneered at organic agriculture as ï¿½pittance farmingï¿½ yet today, your government actively promotes it.
Point being : informed consumers will get what they want, one way or another. There is no denying an idea whose time has come ; interest in raw dairy is at the same stage now as the organic fruit & vegetable segment was in 1984 ï¿½ a niche which turned into a major industry. If your government is truly responsive to the people, then it is incumbent upon you to accommodate the demand for REAL MILK instead of hindering it by illogical regulation.
Around the world, people have awakened to what went on during the last century ï¿½ our food was denatured for the convenience + profit of monolithic corporations. Corporations are permitted to operate on the presumption that it is in everyoneï¿½s best interest peopleï¿½s needs are met for a profit. But, overall, they have done the opposite ; hand in hand with compliant / corrupt governors, corporate interests deliberately ï¿½dumbed-downï¿½ the food supply in order to suit their selfserving convenience. Dividends paid to their shareholders were derived from value literally stolen out of our, and our childrenï¿½s, mouths. Nowhere is that better illustrated than with whole raw fresh milk.
When intelligent consumers realize this, we lose confidence in Big Government. Realizing that we have to take care of ourselves, one of our high priorities is ï¿½healthï¿½, which translates into people taking control of the quality of our food at source.
People I know who are convinced of the value of REAL MILK are determined to obtain what we believe is essential to maintaining and enhancing our quality of life. We want to do that in a simple, honest way. We want to avoid all the wrangling / expense of a court battle. Still, I am ready to go that route on this issue, if necessary.
Unlearned in the law as I am, it seems to me that the provision in the Canadian Bill of Rights concerning property, as well section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, entitles every one to produce co-operatively, whole raw cowï¿½s and goatï¿½s milk for his / her personal use and enjoyment without interference from overbearing regulators.
I am not asking for free legal advice ; but I am entitled to clarification of certain laws in order to know how to govern myself properly. So my question is : letï¿½s say I and a dozen other people each throw in $100 to buy a cow, then pay someone a weekly fee to board that cow for us, which fee includes milking. Thus, each of us has a property interest in her.
According to our agreement, each partner has a property interest in what our asset, Bossy, produces - primarily milk * - proportionate to the amount of investment, and also dependent upon ante-ing up the boarding fee ; no fee that week = no milk that week. * In such a common law partnership, there will eventually be other products ie pedigreed calves / colostrum / meat / hide / horns / manure, to which we are entitled - in kind or in money - as profit from our investment.
As we divvy up such produce, we are taking possession of our own property. I say that we ought to be able to take that dividend home from the farm, to use and enjoy without fear of the ï¿½milk policeï¿½ coming ï¿½round and hauling us away to be prosecuted for breaching some ignorantly-contrived statute. What do you say ?
Gordon S. Watson
May 14th 2001 A. D.
Minister of Health for British Columbia,
Parliament Buildings Victoria
Enclosed please find a copy of a news article about raw milk, along with a print-out of the information at the internet site mentioned therein. This article is a classic example of propaganda ... Big Brother using the lapdog press as its ventriloquist dummy for merchandising a cover-story to prop up the communist monopoly over the essential means of production.
The purpose of my letter is three-fold:
first, to have an official response from your Ministry right away on the questions posed;
second, to put into your hands material telling the other side of the story about raw milk so as to have a scientific basis for changing the law in B. C. ;
third, to have your ministry retract the misinformation currently posted on the website.
Whereas your website @www.hlth.gov.bc.calhlthfile/hfileO3.html. states
"There is absolutely no evidence to support the contention that raw milk is more nutritious than pasteurized milk." "There is no scientific evidence that raw milk makes you more resistant to disease."
"There is no scientific evidence that raw milk better promotes the development of teeth."
Each of those is demonstrably false. I find it appalling that government "experts" on health are unaware of the work of Weston A. Price, Pottinger and Steinman who did some of the basic research in human nutrition, particularly, teeth. In light of their work, and many more scientific studies since, your official statments are utter nonsense.
Herbert Spencer said
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is condemnation without investigation. "
Enclosed find a copy of The Milk Book How Science is Destroying Nature's Nearly Perfect Food" by Dr. Wm. Campbell Douglass; ISBN # 1-885236-04-2. Anyone with intellectual integrity who reads it will find out how stupid your ministry's statements about raw milk are. With this book now in hand, your Ministry has the duty of care to correct the false advertising I bring to your attention.
As explained below, unless the law is changed so that British Columbians choose their own food without interference from an ill-informed, meddling government, there is the distinct possibility of a Constitutional Challenge to the law which outlaws commerce in raw milk. To prepare for that eventuality, and pursuant to the Freedom of Information & Protection of Privacy Act Revised Statutes of British Columbia, I require and hereby demand copies of the following; all material in the possession of your Ministry concerning the assertions on the above-mentioned website under "For example",
5 members of a family became ill with Salmonella from raw goat's milk.
On Central Vancouver Island, 9 out of 13 kindergarten children became ill with Campylobacter after drinking raw milk while on a school visit to a local farm.
In Vernon, numerous cases of Campylobacter were traced to the consumption of raw milk.
In the Kootenays, a 35 year old woman needed surgery and a long stay in hospital due to Brucella infection She had previously consumed raw milk from several sources.
In Ladysmith, a 4 year old girl developed neck abscesses due to Yersinia Infection. The family had consumed raw milk for many years. The older brother previously had a similar abscess in his neck and lip.
On the Queen Charlotte Islands, 2 people developed Toxoplasmosis after consuming raw goat's milk.
You will be aware that Regulation 181/88 of the Health Act Revised Statutes of British Columbia defines "health hazard" as "milk for human consumption that has not been pasteurized ...", Thus it is an offence for people to buy, sell or trade in fresh, whole, raw cow's or goat's milk.
On the ground that it is far-superior to my health, I believe that I ought to be able to enjoy fresh whole raw milk without interference from government. Therefore this letter is the opening salvo in a political campaign to have the Health Act and the Milk Industry Act changed so raw milk is lawfully available.
My own personal experience, along with many people I know, bears out Dr. Douglass' assertions. In a nutshell, what he presents is that
. properly produced and cared for, whole raw cow's and goat's milk are some of the very best sources of nutrition for human beings; . the substance currently marketed as 'milk' is far-removed from the real thing;
. by the time the substance being sold today as 'milk' reaches the consumer, it has been so altered that most of its nutrients are unavailable to human metabolism. Pasteurization destroys essential enzymes. Homogenization causes artheriosclerosis ;
. arguments concerning the 'unhealthfull-ness' of raw milk are calculated mis-information originating with the dairy cartel, as part of a criminal conspiracy to restrict trade so as to prevent competition for its much-inferior product.
Aside from the scientific studies showing it to be nutritionally far-superior, the legal situation wherein fresh, whole, raw cow's / goat's milk is so maligned that simply handing it over the fence-line is an offence, is absurd. To illustrate just how absurd, contrast the situation where, today, I can walk into the liquor store and purchase a quart of gin, go out on the sidewalk and gulp the whole thing down. Of course I will then go into shock very likely leading to death. Exercising my "choice" to kill myself by alcohol poisoning is not illegal. But should I purchase a quart of fresh, whole raw milk from this morning's milking, your government will come down on me and the farmer like a ton of bricks, arrest us, then put us through a criminal trial.
Not only does the government NOT interfere in my freedom to choose my own alcoholic poison, it actively promotes the booze industry. Everyone knows that alcohol abuse is a major problem, yet your government happily regulates and promotes a substance known to cause harm, alcohol. Every session the legislature grovels still lower to the liquor interests, re-writing regulations to enable alcoholics to get their fix easier. To a government addicted to deficit-spending, the income from booze taxes outweighs genuine concern for the Public Health.
But what used to be known as good and proper and healthful- i. e. fresh, raw, whole cow's and goat's milk - the most natural, life-giving thing on earth, which, according to the Bible is our heritage - is categorized as a "health hazard"! Suffocating state-interference turns that which is right, i. e. production of food, into a crime. Meanwhile, what used to be well-understood as vice, the booze racket, is now carried on under color of law. People who, during Prohibition, were demonized as 'gangsters' and 'merchants-of-death' are now seen as up-standing members of the community... as long as they split their ill-gotten gains with government. Today, people like me who simply want to get back to basics in order to regain our health, after awakening from the deceptions of the food corporations, are outlaws.
Regulation 181/88 was enacted upon a bogus premise, i. e. that milk cannot be produced / delivered clean enough to be disease-free unless it is pasteurized. Searching the laws of the United States on the topic of the sale of raw milk for personal use, I've located twenty states which permit it to be purchased legally. Perhaps the Minister will explain how 400 million people in the European Economic Community get away with drinking raw cow, goat and sheep milk, without major problems, yet, supposedly, we in British Columbia can't manage to do it?
I remind you of the recent newspaper interview wherein former Health Minister Evans said that he enjoyed un-pasteurized apple juice. Regarding apple juice, he was quoted "British Columbians should be able to make a choice." Yet on the same website as your scaremongering about raw milk, we find the Ministry's official stance that raw juices ought to be outlawed. Why not Mr. Evan's common-sense approach to whole, raw, fresh cow's milk?
I remind all concerned of the criminal prosecution of Jim Strauss, charged in Kamloops last fall with "practising medicine without a licence" for selling his heart drops. I buy and use Mr. Strauss' product. I aver that it certainly does have a genuinely therapeutic affect on me. When Mr. Strauss brought a Constitutional Challenge to the law under which he was charged, Crown Counsel stayed the charge. I think the Crown did that because they sensed the position they were called to argue was untenable. Similarly, I believe that a constitutional challenge may succeed in deterring the Crown from trying to justify both a] - Regulation 181/88, and b] - the relevant sections of the Milk Industry Act. If I start supplying my fellow health-food fanatics with raw milk, and a charge against me of breaching those laws does go ahead, then I could make a good case for having the Court strike the Regulation down. In such a Constitutional Question the validity of the entire Milk Marketing Monopoly will necessarily be canvassed.
I urge everyone in your Ministry to reconsider this issue from the perspective of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I believe that, out of section 7 of the Charter one can extrapolate a right to choose what foods he or she prefers to eat. And that that idea can be extended to trade in foods / medicines. Preparing for such a Constitutional Question, and pursuant to the Freedom of Infonnation & Protection of Privacy Act, I require and hereb